What it sells
AI platform for patent professionals: drafting inside Word, office action responses, prior art search, patentability, FTO and invalidity analysis.
Business model breakdown
Buyer: who owns the budget?
Partners / heads of IP at law firms and in-house counsel (Head of IP at Philips, Greenberg Traurig principal quoted).
Trigger: what makes them buy now?
Pressure to do more patent work with less headcount and higher margins; faster drafting and prosecution.
Workflow: what inputs become what output?
Generate applications from invention disclosures, analyze rejections and draft responses with case law, semantic prior-art search.
Economics: what it saves and how it charges
Claims up to 70% faster drafting, 2h+ saved per attorney per day, 25k+ applications drafted; Philips trial saw ~20% efficiency gain.
Distribution: how it reaches customers
Request demo, talk to team, or start a free trial.
Funding history and coverage
| Round date | Stage | Amount | Investors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | — | $25M | — | news.google.com |
Profiles summarize public reporting and company websites. Business-model notes are MaxBC's reading of that material, not confirmed facts; unknowns are left blank rather than guessed. Updated 2026-10-12.