What it sells
Governance layer that gives AI coding agents a team's architecture rules, security policies and coding standards before code is written, with violation blocking and deviation audit trail.
Business model breakdown
Buyer: who owns the budget?
UnverifiedEngineering leaders, platform/architecture leads and security/compliance owners at software teams (incl. embedded/MISRA teams) rolling out Claude Code, Cursor and Copilot.
Trigger: what makes them buy now?
Teams adopted AI coding agents and now find rule violations in code review or face audit risk (e.g. undocumented MISRA deviations) since agents do not know org-specific standards.
Workflow: what inputs become what output?
Rules are injected into the agent per task; agent cannot finish while a rule is unresolved; deviations need a named reviewer approval and are logged.
Economics: what it saves and how it charges
Per-seat SaaS: Team EUR 18 per user per month with 14-day free trial; Enterprise custom; plus fixed-fee services (Rules & Standards Setup from EUR 1,900, AI Efficiency Tune-Up from EUR 900).
Distribution: how it reaches customers
Self-serve free trial plus demo for enterprise.
Funding history and coverage
| Round date | Stage | Amount | Investors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-23 | Seed | 1,1 Mio. € | — | news.google.com |
Profiles summarize public reporting and company websites. Business-model notes are MaxBC's reading of that material, not confirmed facts; unknowns are left blank rather than guessed. Updated 2026-10-13.