What it sells
Safer, faster dependency upgrades
Business model breakdown
Buyer: who owns the budget?
UnverifiedVP Engineering / engineering leads at companies running Ruby, JavaScript, TypeScript or Python apps (testimonials from VP Product and Engineering, Senior Engineer).
Trigger: what makes them buy now?
Apps going stale on open source dependencies, creating security vulnerabilities, CVEs, compliance headaches and lock-in; need to move to a supported language or framework version.
Workflow: what inputs become what output?
Connect GitHub app or CLI to sync dependencies, Infield builds a risk-ranked upgrade plan, then its expert developers perform the upgrades (fixing breaking changes) or the customer uses the software-only plan.
Economics: what it saves and how it charges
Managed service plus software: fixed fee per upgrade milestone based on app size and complexity instead of hourly consulting; software-only plans for in-house teams.
Distribution: how it reaches customers
Lead-gen via a paid-style Diagnostic report and demo requests; embedded support in customer Slack/Teams.
Funding history and coverage
| Round date | Stage | Amount | Investors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Y Combinator Winter 2020 | — | Y Combinator | ycombinator.com |
Profiles summarize public reporting and company websites. Business-model notes are MaxBC's reading of that material, not confirmed facts; unknowns are left blank rather than guessed. Updated 2026-10-12.