What it sells
Secure Collaboration for Technical Teams
Business model breakdown
Buyer: who owns the budget?
UnverifiedCISO / IT and security leadership at government, defense, critical-infrastructure and regulated enterprises (inferred from segments and Contact Sales/Request Quote tiers).
Trigger: what makes them buy now?
Need for data sovereignty and control, e.g. replacing Slack or running air-gapped/classified operations and incident response; site cites a customer story "Replaces Slack: data sovereignty, control, and flexibility are why".
Workflow: what inputs become what output?
Teams run secure channel-based messaging, calls, workflow automation and incident-response playbooks (DevSecOps, mission ops, ChatOps) on self-hosted or air-gapped deployments, with AI agents integrated via bring-your-own LLM.
Economics: what it saves and how it charges
Paid editions priced per package (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced) with a limited-use free evaluation edition; revenue from enterprise subscriptions and security services.
Distribution: how it reaches customers
Enterprise sales-led (Contact Sales / Get Pricing / Request Quote) plus free evaluation download, partners, marketplace and community.
Funding history and coverage
| Round date | Stage | Amount | Investors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Y Combinator Summer 2012 | — | Y Combinator | ycombinator.com |
Profiles summarize public reporting and company websites. Business-model notes are MaxBC's reading of that material, not confirmed facts; unknowns are left blank rather than guessed. Updated 2026-10-12.